And if we stopped the bullshit?
But then, the Greens (the City and Township) indicated that if the Socialists (the City) were not what they, the Greens (the city and canton), had decided the Socialists (the City) should do is to say abandon one of their seats in the Municipality of Geneva them, the Greens (the City and Canton), would Sonderbund with "Set left "against the Socialists (the City). As if 'Set Left "had nothing better to do: try to make up lost ground in four years in the City and Canton, for example. We hoped that such an ultimatum, slightly presumptuous and not based on any basis other than a political game of musical chairs, will find an echo in PS, chuckling, that he deserves. Both
only messing ...
The left has not yet delivered, what should be its top priority and indeed the only one that that he spends most of our resources, maintaining its majority in the Council of the City (it will at least respect, the majority nor the Agreement or the extreme right being able to exceed the Alternative), it is already to quibble about how much it will candidates are on the list for the Administrative Council, what it-s-es candidate she will if she will list the common or separate lists, so it will present a seat right, if a party claiming an additional seat should try to take his opponents or his allies-brief, good grub big election though indigestible. This is obviously not, we would have suspected, from a substantive political disagreement that takes place year to which the poor engage the Greens and one hardly sees any common position divergent from that of PS could meet Greens and "left of the left" against the Socialists. Regardless, by the way: the fact is that, unable to resurrect an "agreement" obsolete past four years ago with one of the candidates are Socialists, the Greens are considering an alliance with "Set Left" against the PS, the objective being to beat more then the right, or to keep majority Administrative Council nor for the Greens to win a seat. but to punish the Socialists for having the nerve to win a seat at the executive four years ago, and want to keep it. The "2007 agreement" implied in fact no one party has to give up a seat he already holds, and the exercise would be utterly absurd, that would be to ask the Socialist Party to engage in an election campaign with the goal of losing a seat, demobilization strategy for its own electorate and his own ambition to defeat, just to satisfy a partner relating to a candidate who already has little chance of being elected on a common list, and would do practically no longer on separate lists. Of the five seats in the Municipalities of Geneva, two are practically out of reach of anyone other than their current owners, Sandrine Salerno and Rémy Pagani. One can also venture to bet that Pierre Maudet, borne by the entire Agreement, has all the cards to be reelected if the Alternative gathers on a single list by leaving a place (where it has five nominations, the suspense becomes real) given the weakness of one of two nominations green, that of the liberal candidates and political vacuity of the PDC application. This leaves two seats, coveted by five or seven candidates: a socialist (which is claiming that the maintenance of an already registered Socialist), a Green, whose profile political and social practice, it will certainly get the support of the electorate to the left, a Green (who claims a seat for the Greens, but intends to rob the PS and not to the right, is likely to call this second Socialist candidate for the House Geneva real estate, private bankers and sunbathers Kazakhstan), a liberal (who thinks he can recover the lost Liberal seat four years ago, but his party as the rope supports a hanged) and PDC (who thinks he can get the seat Christian Democrat lost twenty years ago by accumulating "gifts" from the right to financial affairs). Besides the possible applications of the UDC gesticulatoires and CWM. Now the City of Geneva, the right can get a seat if the left is stupid enough to let him and his three-components stupid enough to contest the seats they already have, rather than unite to defend them, or even win one more, but on the opponent, not the best. Being able to move rather than waiting for others recede, is it too much to ask? Being able to fight to gain seats in the right rather than its allies, is expecting too much? We'll know on March 13 at night (or 14 at dawn), when the general meetings of Socialists and Greens have adopted their positions. And then we hope we will not have to ask (and answer in the affirmative) only if both messing around, it does not deserve to go, frankly, to the end, in joy and good humor of mocking a mess coruscant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment